Calculated result
Engineering evaluation Entered maximum kW/ton criterion met Chiller operating efficiency (E) 0.6 kW/ton
Coefficient of performance (COP) 5.861 ratio
Cooling capacity (Qton) 500 ton Engineering interpretation The entered operating point is 0.6 kW/ton with COP 5.861. The efficiency field and result remain kW/ton in both unit views.
Important limitations Keep thermal-capacity and electrical-input boundaries consistent. Plant kW/ton may also include pumps, towers, and auxiliaries. Copy results Open printable PDF Download PDF
Report a calculation concern
Engineering knowledge center
Understand the calculation—not just the answer 2026-08-07 · Free Library Equations & method Engineering guide Reference data & sources
Governing relationships Qton = Q
E = P/Qton
COP = 3.51685284/E
compare E with Emax
Current substitution Qton = 500; E = 300/500 = 0.6 kW/ton; COP = 5.861; Emax = 1 kW/ton.
Calculation sequence
Step-by-step method Convert SI cooling kW to refrigeration tons when required. Divide electrical input by cooling tons. Compare kW/ton with the user-entered screening value and show COP for reference. Equation legend
Inputs and calculated quantities
Q Cooling capacity — ton or kW
P Chiller electrical input — kW
Emax Entered maximum screening value — kW/ton in both views
E Chiller operating efficiency — kW/ton
COP Coefficient of performance — ratio
Qton Cooling capacity — ton Applications
How this calculation is used Building design Compare scheduled capacity and input power.
Construction Check metering boundaries.
Commissioning Calculate field kW/ton and COP from simultaneous measurements.
Quality controls
Assumptions and limitations Assumptions Entered data describe one stable operating condition and use consistent measurement boundaries. Time, energy, and performance values are representative of the stated interval. Limitations The efficiency input and result remain kW per refrigeration ton in both I-P and SI capacity views. Plant kW/ton may also include pumps, towers, and auxiliaries; use a consistent metering boundary. Field use
Verification procedure Confirm the operating mode, test boundary, and instrument calibration. Collect simultaneous readings or a documented trend interval. Compare the result with the approved sequence, submittal, and project criteria. Common engineering mistakes Combining measurements from different operating modes or time intervals. Ignoring sensor uncertainty, trend sampling, or the defined equipment boundary. Technical basis
References and source standards Need project-specific support?
Work with SVE Group Use this free tool for preliminary evaluation and field support. For project requirements, system analysis, commissioning, or engineering services, connect with SVE Group.
Visit SVE Group Contact the firm Engineering calculation disclaimer These engineering tools are provided for educational, preliminary evaluation, field verification, and commissioning support. Results depend on the accuracy of user-entered information and the assumptions stated for each calculation. Every colored status and comparison is a screening indicator only; project criteria, contract requirements, applicable codes, manufacturer instructions, measurement uncertainty, and authorized engineering judgment govern. The tools do not replace project-specific engineering analysis or the judgment of a licensed professional engineer.
Read the full use and limitation statement