Calculated result
Engineering evaluation Screening estimate—review assumptions Estimated chiller electrical energy (Eel) 450,000 kWh
Cooling capacity (Qton) 500 ton
Average electrical input (Pavg) 225 kW Engineering interpretation Estimated chiller energy is 450000 kWh at average input 225 kW. The efficiency input remains kW/ton in both unit views.
Important limitations kW/ton varies with load, temperatures, flows, fouling, staging, and auxiliaries. Use interval data for detailed energy analysis. Copy results Open printable PDF Download PDF
Report a calculation concern
Engineering knowledge center
Understand the calculation—not just the answer 2026-08-07 · Free Library Equations & method Engineering guide Reference data & sources
Governing relationships Qton = Q
Pavg = Qton·E·LF/100
Eel = Pavg·t
Current substitution Qton = 500; Pavg = 500×0.6×75/100 = 225 kW; Eel = 450000 kWh.
Calculation sequence
Step-by-step method Convert SI cooling capacity to refrigeration tons when required. Apply kW/ton and average load factor for average power. Multiply by runtime for electrical energy. Equation legend
Inputs and calculated quantities
Q Cooling capacity — ton or kW
E Operating efficiency — kW/ton
t Runtime — h
LF Average load factor — %
Eel Estimated chiller electrical energy — kWh
Qton Cooling capacity — ton
Pavg Average electrical input — kW Applications
How this calculation is used Building design Screen chiller energy at an operating profile.
Construction Check power and capacity measurement boundaries.
Commissioning Estimate period energy from representative capacity and kW/ton.
Quality controls
Assumptions and limitations Assumptions Entered data describe one stable operating condition and use consistent measurement boundaries. Time, energy, and performance values are representative of the stated interval. Limitations This is a preliminary evaluation and commissioning-support tool, not an automatic acceptance determination. Project sequences, manufacturer data, tariffs, codes, and professional review remain controlling. Field use
Verification procedure Confirm the operating mode, test boundary, and instrument calibration. Collect simultaneous readings or a documented trend interval. Compare the result with the approved sequence, submittal, and project criteria. Common engineering mistakes Combining measurements from different operating modes or time intervals. Ignoring sensor uncertainty, trend sampling, or the defined equipment boundary. Technical basis
References and source standards Need project-specific support?
Work with SVE Group Use this free tool for preliminary evaluation and field support. For project requirements, system analysis, commissioning, or engineering services, connect with SVE Group.
Visit SVE Group Contact the firm Engineering calculation disclaimer These engineering tools are provided for educational, preliminary evaluation, field verification, and commissioning support. Results depend on the accuracy of user-entered information and the assumptions stated for each calculation. Every colored status and comparison is a screening indicator only; project criteria, contract requirements, applicable codes, manufacturer instructions, measurement uncertainty, and authorized engineering judgment govern. The tools do not replace project-specific engineering analysis or the judgment of a licensed professional engineer.
Read the full use and limitation statement