Calculate heat-exchanger effectiveness from hot- and cold-side inlet/outlet temperatures and capacity rates.
Why it matters: Effectiveness compares actual heat transfer with the thermodynamic maximum for the entered streams.
ΣCALCULATE · VERIFY · INTERPRET
Calculated result
Engineering evaluation
Entered energy-balance criterion not met
Heat-exchanger effectiveness (ε)47.5 %
Average measured heat transfer (Qavg)
380,000 Btu/h
Hot/cold energy-balance mismatch (Bal)
10.53 %
Entered maximum balance mismatch (Balmax)
10 %
Minimum stream capacity rate (Cmin)
8,000 Btu/(h·°F)
Maximum possible heat transfer (Qmax)
800,000 Btu/h
Engineering interpretation
The entered condition gives 47.5% effectiveness with 10.53% hot/cold energy-balance mismatch versus the entered 10% maximum. The entered energy-balance criterion is not met.
Important limitations
A large energy-balance mismatch indicates inconsistent flow, properties, temperatures, boundaries, heat loss, transient operation, or measurement uncertainty.
Average the two measured rates and calculate their balance mismatch.
Check physical effectiveness and compare mismatch with the user-entered maximum.
Equation legend
Inputs and calculated quantities
Ch
Hot-stream capacity rate — Btu/(h·°F) or kW/K
Cc
Cold-stream capacity rate — Btu/(h·°F) or kW/K
Thi
Hot-stream inlet temperature — °F or °C
Tho
Hot-stream outlet temperature — °F or °C
Tci
Cold-stream inlet temperature — °F or °C
Tco
Cold-stream outlet temperature — °F or °C
Balmax
Entered maximum energy-balance mismatch — %
ε
Heat-exchanger effectiveness — %
Qavg
Average measured heat transfer — Btu/h
Bal
Hot/cold energy-balance mismatch — %
Balmax
Entered maximum balance mismatch — %
Cmin
Minimum stream capacity rate — Btu/(h·°F)
Qmax
Maximum possible heat transfer — Btu/h
Applications
How this calculation is used
Building design
Screen heat-exchanger performance at an operating point.
Construction
Check sensor locations, flow direction, and capacity-rate basis.
Commissioning
Calculate effectiveness and hot/cold energy-balance mismatch from simultaneous readings.
Quality controls
Assumptions and limitations
Assumptions
Entered values represent one stable operating condition and use consistent measurement boundaries.
Fluid and air properties are representative of the evaluated condition.
Limitations
This is a preliminary evaluation and field-verification tool, not a final sizing or code-compliance determination.
Manufacturer data, adopted codes, project criteria, and professional engineering review remain controlling.
Field use
Verification procedure
Confirm measurement boundaries, operating mode, and instrument calibration.
Stabilize the system and record simultaneous readings.
Compare the calculation with project requirements and manufacturer data before disposition.
Common engineering mistakes
Mixing values from different operating conditions.
Using nominal rather than measured flow, temperature, power, or fluid properties.
Technical basis
References and source standards
ASHRAE Handbook—FundamentalsPsychrometrics, heat transfer, load relationships, and HVAC calculation context; verify the licensed current edition during professional review.
These engineering tools are provided for educational, preliminary evaluation, field verification, and commissioning support. Results depend on the accuracy of user-entered information and the assumptions stated for each calculation. Every colored status and comparison is a screening indicator only; project criteria, contract requirements, applicable codes, manufacturer instructions, measurement uncertainty, and authorized engineering judgment govern. The tools do not replace project-specific engineering analysis or the judgment of a licensed professional engineer.