Convert differential-pressure signal percent to ideal flow percent and flow using the square-law relationship.
Why it matters: Transparent data reduction keeps raw values, criteria, symbols, and arithmetic available for review.
ΣCALCULATE · VERIFY · INTERPRET
Calculated result
Engineering evaluation
Calculation complete—verify project criteria
Square-root extracted flow (Q)500 units
Extracted flow percent (Q%)
50 %
Engineering interpretation
A 25% differential signal corresponds to 50% flow and 500 units under the square-law assumption.
Important limitations
Use only when the signal truly represents differential pressure across a fixed flow element and square-root extraction has not already been applied elsewhere.
Engineering knowledge center
Understand the calculation—not just the answer
2026-08-07 · Free Library
Governing relationships
Q%=100√(ΔP%/100)
Q=Q_d Q%/100
Current substitution
Q%=100√(25/100)=50%; Q=1000×50/100=500.
Calculation sequence
Step-by-step method
Confirm the measurement boundary, time basis, and formula symbols.
Apply the displayed equation to the user-entered values.
Review data quality, uncertainty, project criteria, and professional disposition.
Equation legend
Inputs and calculated quantities
ΔP%
Differential-pressure signal — % span
Q_d
Flow at 100% signal — selected units
Q
Square-root extracted flow — units
Q%
Extracted flow percent — %
Applications
How this calculation is used
Building design
Prepare a visible analytical basis for a planned test or monitoring point.
Construction
Reduce startup, TAB, controls, and field-observation data consistently.
Commissioning
Evaluate recorded measurements without hiding project criteria or uncertainty assumptions.
Quality controls
Assumptions and limitations
Assumptions
Entered observations describe a common measurement boundary and compatible units.
Sampling, timestamps, instruments, and user-entered criteria are documented outside the arithmetic.
Limitations
The calculation does not create an acceptance criterion, uncertainty budget, or engineering disposition.
Project requirements, procedures, calibration, data quality, and authorized judgment remain controlling.
Field use
Verification procedure
Confirm the test boundary, sampling interval, units, and raw-data source.
Enter the recorded values and any authorized user-supplied criterion.
Review the arithmetic with uncertainty, procedure, and project requirements before disposition.
Common engineering mistakes
Combining unsynchronized values or incompatible measurement boundaries.
Ignoring resolution, uncertainty, sample selection, missing data, clock offset, or test conditions.
These engineering tools are provided for educational, preliminary evaluation, field verification, and commissioning support. Results depend on the accuracy of user-entered information and the assumptions stated for each calculation. Every colored status and comparison is a screening indicator only; project criteria, contract requirements, applicable codes, manufacturer instructions, measurement uncertainty, and authorized engineering judgment govern. The tools do not replace project-specific engineering analysis or the judgment of a licensed professional engineer.